817-831-3100

FW Principal Office. 8:30AM-5:30PM M-F

214-219-6464

Dallas Office. 8:30AM-5:30PM M-F

Facebook

Twitter

Menu

Texas DWI Deportation Warning

No more “three strikes” law for deportation

Almost everyone knows one of the basic rules of baseball is “Three strikes, you’re out”! For the longest time, Texas DWI deportation (and some other areas of the law) operated on the same premise. A person is not subject to deportation until their third “strike” (meaning their first felony DWI). Unknown to most of us, this has started changing in the shadows. Immigration has now started to deport people for a second DWI conviction instead of waiting for a third. There does not seem to be any clear rhyme or reason to this change. But, it is a change that may affect many people in the DFW area. Even worse, you may not know about the deportation until your DWI probation is over! Just imagine doing everything the State and the Court told you to do just to finish probation and have the police deport you.

There is one huge exception to this rule, which goes back to when the law operated under the “three strikes” premise. ANY conviction for a drug-based Texas DWI (any drug aside from alcohol, including prescription medication) is an AUTOMATIC deportation. If you are searching for a “DWI lawyer near me”, know that Mimi handles most of North Texas, including the following counties: Tarrant, Collin, Dallas, Denton, Grey, Hood, Wise, Johnson, and Parker. As part of representing you on your case, Mimi will conduct a full case evaluation and discuss whether your immigration or residency status may be at risk.

Even if you are not subject to deportation, there are other consequences of a Texas DWI. For example, a single DWI can affect your ability to obtain permanent resident status in the United States.

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 26.13 requires courts to “admonish” a defendant of the consequences of a guilty plea. These admonishments include the possibility of deportation. Unfortunately, courts need only admonish on the possibility of deportation, not state that the defendant will, in fact, face deportation.

 

More about Mimi Coffey

When people look for a Top DWI Attorney or Best DWI Attorney, they look for experience, certification, and respect in the legal community. Mimi Coffey is a nationally-renowned trial attorney, board-certified in DWI by the NCDD. She has been practicing for over 24 years and is an author of multiple DWI Defense textbooks. She is also a national and state-wide lecturer on the law.

The Coffey Firm handles a wide variety of cases, including Unlawful Carrying Weapon (UCW), Assault (including family violence), Theft, and Possession charges.

Mimi is also listed on several “best” directory listings such as DWI Lawyers for Wise County, DWI Lawyer Tarrant CountyDWI attorney Dallas County, DWI attorneys Collin County and DWI attorneys Parker County. Mimi is a caring DWI Lawyer in DFW, She is also involved in the Texas Tech School of Law foundation and enjoys using the skills she has developed to give back to the community.

Defending Asleep-at-the-Wheel Cases

Defending Asleep-at-the-Wheel Cases

Mimi Coffey DWI Lawyer, Texas DWI

By Mimi Coffey

Ethanol is a central nervous system depressant. As one ingests more, the body is subject to more central nervous system depressant effects up to and including death. One of the well-known side effects of the ingestion of alcohol is sleepiness. However, an issue in a DWI case is the ability to scientifically distinguish between sleep deprivation and intoxication. Sleep deprivation brings about changes in physical and cognitive behaviors which are very similar to alcohol impairment including disorientation, slurred speech, and the inability to control the body and perform simple tasks.[1] Although they are frequently used interchangeably, the terms fatigue and sleepiness are vastly different. One study makes the distinctions:

Fatigue is a more complex phenomenon that may be defined as the decreased capability of doing physical or mental work, or the subjective state in which one can no longer perform a task effectively.[2] Sleepiness has a more specific meaning than fatigue, relating to reduced alertness as a result of increased pressure to fall asleep… It is associated with decrements in

vigilance, reaction time, memory, psychomotor coordination, information processing, and decision making.[3]

Studies have shown that a sleep deprived individual can exhibit a lack of coordination, memory impairment, personality change, irritability, blurring of vision, unsteadiness and transient confusion.[4] Additionally, the emotions of a sleep deprived person can be negatively affected. A strong relationship has been found between sleep and the intensity of manic symptoms. [5] A study on male teenagers has proven a correlation between sleep deficiency and aggression[6]. Extensive lack of sleep (over a few days) has shown decreased emotional intelligence, deteriorated interpersonal skills, enhanced esoteric thinking and a tendency to become superstitious, as well as intense frustration and aggression.[7] An area of concern arises in the context of sleep deprivation prevalence, which exists even separate and distinct from alcohol use. It is estimated that 30-50% of all adults suffer from some form of sleep deprivation, which affects their thinking, ability to process information, and reaction time.[8]

In discerning the impact of sleep deprivation, it is important to understand that this phenomenon is not related to the last 24 hours of one’s day. It has been shown that getting six hours of sleep for ten days straight is the equivalent of a sleep deprived person who has not slept in 24 hours[9]. The key for the attorney is to delve deep into the facts and determine whether sleep deprivation issues are relevant and to what degree. Fatigue of 20-25 hours of sleeplessness impairs task performance comparable to a .10 alcohol concentration.[10] Another study focused on time of day and the body’s circadian rhythm revealing that between 10:00 pm and midnight, deficits from sleep equivocated to a BAC of .05%[11]

The Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus test has been proven to be very problematic according to the 2007 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s Robustness of The Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test Study. Their own data proves false positives for those not .08 or more. Dr. Karl Citek, an often-referenced government advocate of the HGN, testified under oath in a Daubert hearing of In re Seiler on February 13, 2014 that 50-60 % of normal sober individuals will exhibit end point nystagmus (HGN at maximum deviation).[12] He concedes that he has seen individuals demonstrate all six clues, as well as vertical, while under the .08 limit.[13] In that same hearing he testified that, in the study he conducted in 2011 involving sleep deprivation of at least 24 hours, there were no effects on the field sobriety tests[14]. One must carefully analyze this study and its source. He is referring to his Sleep Deprivation Does Not Mimic Alcohol Intoxication on Field Sobriety Testing study which had representatives of the Oregon State Police and Washington County (Oregon) Sheriff’s Office as two of its authors.

On the first page of his study, Citek concedes that “SD (sleep deprivation) has been shown to affect saccadic eye movements (the jerking looked for in the HGN). [15] His graph of endpoint nystagmus (HGN at maximum deviation) shows nearly 90% of sleep deprived individuals displaying these clues with less than .04 alcohol[16]. The study is flawed as only 1 out of 29 test subjects was over 34 years old (not representative of the DWI population) and none of the tests were conducted during typical DWI arrest times (past midnight into early morning where the one’s circadian rhythm is disrupted). Yet despite such a biased study, Citek’s statistical analysis showed that the One-Leg Stand count (cognitive reasoning) decreased with sleep deprivation.[17] Outside the HGN test, police officers frequently use “bloodshot eyes” to describe an intoxicated person. Yet this is a very common physical sign of fatigue. As a matter of fact, in Jack Stuster’s U.S. Department of Transportation, NHTSA Final Report, The Detection of DWI at BACs Below 0.10 (Sept. 1997), the NHTSA took the position:

“Finally, some cues were eliminated because they might be indicators more of social class than of alcohol impairment. … a flushed or red face and bloodshot eyes are open to subjective interpretation and could be due to allergies or caused by outdoor work.”[18]

One very good clue that an individual is sleep deprived as opposed to intoxicated would be the physical presence of bags under one’s eyes.

The existence of sleep deprivation in automobile crashes is all too common. One British study found that alcohol (in amounts equal to .08) produced impairment across the whole drive with respect to simulated steering performance, while on average the sleep deprivation subjects showed normal steering at the start of the drive with progressive deterioration.[19] As a result, it is very important that the defense lawyer closely dissect the driving at hand. Were there 911 calls at the start of the drive? If so, over what distances? Crashes are part and parcel to sleep deprivation as well as intoxication. A 2008 National Sleep Foundation survey found that more than 36% of participants reported falling asleep while driving at least once in the past year.[20] As a matter of fact, “drowsiness is the primary causal factor in 100,000 police-reported crashes each year, resulting in 76,000 injuries and 1,500 deaths.”[21]

The time of crashes also relates to the body’s circadian rhythm. Findings in one study show that the major time of crashes occurs during the night with a secondary peak at siesta time (3 pm).[22] It is worth noting that in New Mexico, there was an increase in the number and proportion of alcohol-related traffic crashes following the seven days after the change to and from daylight savings.[23] Even one of the founders of NHTSA’s standardized field sobriety testing program, H. Moskowitz, has conceded, “[c]onsidering that the majority of alcohol-related accidents occur at night, there is a need for increased examination on the role of fatigue, circadian cycles, and sleep loss.”[24] There is also a strong correlation between sleep apnea and the risk of having a traffic accident[25]

The bottom line is that lack of sleep produces many of the same effects associated with being drunk, including lack of coordination, judgment and reaction time. [26] It has been found that sleep of five hours a night for four consecutive days impairs performance to such a degree that traffic safety is affected. [27] With sleep deprivation becoming a highly researched topic and an area of concern for the NHTSA, it will come as no surprise if there is future a push for laws that directly criminalize sleep deprivation and traffic accidents. The complications will be in proof of sleep deprivation in individual cases, not the underlying problems which cause accidents. Regardless, the issues and rehabilitative concerns for addressing intoxication versus sleep deprivation are different in nature. It is the responsibility of the criminal defense attorney to familiarize one’s self with the sleeping patterns of every DWI case to see the applicability of such a defense.

The body of research out there exists mainly in the medical field. The characteristics of sleep deprivation and intoxication have been proven to overlap. It is not fair to allow a prosecutor, judge or jury to dismiss considerations of sleep deprivation where such considerations are relevant, and sometimes necessary, to one’s case. The field is a vast one, which involves considerations of individuals’ medical issues (is sleep apnea at play or other physical ailment which cause lack of sleep?), employment (is there shift work or sleep loss due to multiple jobs?), and unique sleep patterns at the time of the DWI occurrence (sleep deprivation effects can accumulate over days as reference above, not just a single 24-hour instance). Consulting experts may—and possibly should—include the relevant fact witnesses, such as one’s sleep disorder doctor or primary physician, in addition to sleep experts who are both published and in practice (both therapeutic and medical doctors). Finding the right solution for the sleep deprived DWI client should also involve counseling them to find healthy alternatives and medical solutions that can alleviate their sleep loss and prevent future occurrences.

________________________________________________________________________

[1] Carolyn Schur, DUI and the Effect of Sleepiness, 2 Counterpoint Journal (Aug. 7, 2019), https://www.counterpoint-journal.com/vol-2-iss-2-art-6—sleepiness.html.

[2] James M. Lyznicki, Sleepiness, Driving, and Motor Vehicle Crashes, 279 JAMA 1908, 1909 nn.14-15 (1998).

[3] Id. nn.11, 13.

[4] Michael E. Reid, Fatigue, 42 Mo. DUI Handbook § 5:3 n.18 (2017).

[5] Jolanta Orzel-Gryglewska, Consequences of Sleep Deprivation, 23 Int’l J. Occupational Med. and Envtl. Health 95, 97 n.17 (2010).

[6] Id. at 104.

[7] Id. at 104 nn.119-20.

[8] Reid, supra note 4, n.15.

[9] Clayton Kerbs, The Importance of Sleep, 87-APR J. Kan. B.A. 15, 16 n.8 (2018).

[10] Orzel-Gryglewska, supra note 5, at 107.

[11]A.M. Williamson, Moderate sleep deprivation produces impairments in cognitive and motor performance equivalent to legally prescribed levels of alcohol intoxication, 57 Occup. Environ. Med. 649, 654 nn.15-16 (2000).

[12] In re Seiler, page 21 (2014) (Transcript of Daubert Hearing: Karl Citek).

[13] Id. at 31.

[14] Id. at 4.

[15] Karl Citek, Sleep Deprivation Does Not Mimic Alcohol Intoxication on Field Sobriety Testing, 5 J. Fors. Sci. 1170 nn.41-42 (2011).

[16] Id. at 1176.

[17] Id. at 1173.

[18] Jack Stuster, The Detection of DWI at BACs Below 0.10, US Department of Transportation, page 14 (1997).

[19] M.A. Hack, Comparison of the effects of sleep deprivation, alcohol and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) on simulated steering performance, 95 Respiratory Med. 594, 600 (2001).

[20] George W. Ingham, Another Drink, Another Hour: Using Dram Shop Liability to Determine Employer Liability for Injuries Caused by Fatigued Commuting Employees, 17 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 565 n.3 (2010).

[21] Id. n.4.

[22] Allan I. Pack, Characteristics of Crashes Attributed to the Driver Having Fallen Asleep, 27 Acc. Anal. and Prev. 769, 771 (1995).

[23] E.J.D. Ogden, Effects of Alcohol and Other Drugs on Driver Performance, 5 Traffic Inj. Prev. 185, 190 (2004).

[24] Id. at 185.

[25] J. Teran-Santos, The Association Between Sleep Apnoea and the Risk of Traffic Accidents, 340 New Eng. J. Med. 847 (1999).

[26] P.A. Fransson, Effects of 24-hour and 36-hour sleep deprivation on smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements, 18 J. Vestibular Res. 209 (2008).

[27] David Elmenhorst, Performance impairment during four days partial sleep deprivation compared with the acute effects of alcohol and hypoxia, 10 Sleep Med. 189 (2009).

More about Mimi Coffey

When people look for a Top DWI Attorney or Best DWI Attorney, they look for experience, certification, and respect in the legal community. Mimi Coffey is a nationally-renowned trial attorney, board-certified in DWI by the NCDD. She has been practicing for over 24 years and is an author of multiple DWI Defense textbooks. She is also a national and state-wide lecturer on the law.

The Coffey Firm handles a wide variety of cases, including Unlawful Carrying Weapon (UCW), Assault (including family violence), Theft and Possession charges.

Mimi is also listed on several “top” directory listings such as DWI Lawyers for Wise County, DWI Lawyer Tarrant CountyDWI Lawyer Dallas County, DWI Lawyer Collin County and DWI Lawyer Parker County. Mimi is a caring DWI Lawyer in DFW, She is also involved in the Texas Tech School of Law foundation and enjoys using the skills she has developed to give back to the community.

 

Practical Advice for Going Through the DWI Process

Mimi Coffey DWI Lawyer, Texas DWI, Caring DWI Lawyer

If you are reading this, you or a loved one is probably going through the horrible experience of the DWI Process. Please know that we all make mistakes. We are human. DWI is a unique offense in that no one goes out with the intention of driving intoxicated. Please know you have our greatest sympathies. What you are experiencing is actually very common. Many people, approximately 1.4 million, have gone through exactly what you are experiencing. We have had at least four lawyers at The Coffey Firm who have had an arrest for a DWI or a related offense. We understand. Good people get DWIs. You are not alone. Information is power and vast experience provides insightful information. I hope you find this information helpful.

— Experienced DWI Lawyer Mimi Coffey

THE INITIAL SHOCK OF THE DWI PROCESS

Upon your release from jail, you are probably feeling shock and embarrassment. You are trying to collect your thoughts and memories about what happened and why. It hurts like an open wound; you are anxious to patch it up and reduce the scarring. Next, you are debating about whether to tell certain people and are leaning towards not telling them. Finally, you have wrapped up retrieving your car and figuring out how to account for any missed time at work.

THE BEST PLAN OF ACTION FOR THE DWI PROCESS IS TO:

REMAIN CALM. Realize first that you are in a trauma situation. The best decisions are not made under stress. Resist the knee jerk reaction to take immediate action. I recall several years ago, the heiress to the Walmart fortune was arrested for DWI in Parker County and within days she had hired a civil lawyer who was issuing her apology statement. Despite a vast fortune and ready resources, she chose to hire a lawyer who was not an Experienced DWI Lawyer and who made a foolish move. It is impossible within only days of an arrest for any attorney to know what should be done with a case for its best resolution. Consider the following information:

1. What are the technical issues? All the discovery and an ALR hearing is necessary for a proper analysis of a DWI case. For example, we have had cases where the officer moved to another police department and could not be served. We would not have known this without the ALR hearing. Knowing that a witness may or may not be available for trial can factor into the decision to proceed to trial.

2. Personnel decisions. Who is the Judge? Who is the prosecutor? Will this DA remain on the case or move to another court? These folks play a large part in how your case will proceed and its possible outcome. What may look like intoxication to one prosecutor, may not look like a triable case to another. It is our job as Experienced DWI Lawyers to know these things and position your case to its best advantage.

3. Strategy. Much like a football game that lasts three hours with only eleven minutes of play time, your case will involve a lot of behind-the-scenes work. This work includes but is not limited to discovery accumulation, your license hearing, subpoenas being issued, laboratory work requested, scheduling, case analysis, etc. Strategy can also change for various reasons. In order to get the best result for your case, it is critical to adapt to the changing winds that may benefit our position. For example, a new prosecutor being assigned, etc.

BE DILIGENT.

It is critical that you go back to your life and resume all responsibilities with renewed vigor. If you get cancer, you won’t start administering chemotherapy to yourself. It is our job to do everything we can to ensure that you obtain the best possible result with your case. This means that we ask you to cooperate with us in communicating and providing us information. We will be requesting that you follow in some directives that can optimize your situation depending on the route that we go. Please be diligent in following our advice so that we can best service you.

BE POSITIVE.

The best thing that you can do now is to look for the silver lining. This is a great opportunity for you to take positive measures to ensure that you will never get in this situation again. We can help point you in the right directions. We will always be here to help whenever you need. But we hope that future contact

will be of a friendly nature as opposed to more distress. There is never a better time to change the past than the present. Also, therapy is an excellent way to test what stressors might have led to the current predicament if any, and to take positive steps to deal with those stressors. Take stock in all that is positive in your life and focus on these things.

WHY I CARE

In the twenty-four years that I have been a DWI Attorney, I find the greatest reward is seeing people rediscover themselves after the DWI Process. Whether this comes from a Not Guilty or a reduced charge, or changed habits as a result of a wake-up call, seeing someone go from one of the lowest points of their lives to hope is the best aspect of what The Coffey Firm does. Remember, tough times make us better people. As Robert Schuller said, “Tough times never last, but tough people do.”

More about Mimi Coffey

When people look for an Experienced DWI Lawyer or Best DWI Lawyer, they look for experience, certification, and respect in the legal community. Mimi Coffey is a nationally-renowned trial attorney, board-certified in DWI by the NCDD. She has been practicing for over 24 years and is an author of multiple DWI Defense textbooks. She is also a national and state-wide lecturer on the law.

The Coffey Firm handles a wide variety of cases, including Unlawful Carrying Weapon (UCW), Assault (including family violence), Theft and Possession charges.

Mimi is also listed on several “top” directory listings such as DWI Lawyers for Wise County, DWI Lawyer Tarrant CountyDWI Lawyer Dallas County, DWI Lawyer Collin County and DWI Lawyer Parker County. Mimi is a caring DWI Lawyer in DFW, She is also involved in the Texas Tech School of Law foundation and enjoys using the skills she has developed to give back to the community.

 

Shocking Legal Truths on DWI

The way our government is created is simple. The legislature passes the laws and the judicial branch enforces it. That is the way it is designed. This is not the way it works. The Constitution is the framework that guarantees all rights and sets the parameters for all the state legislatures to follow when passing laws. Simple? It should be. Who on earth would dare defy the Constitution? Judges do it every day. Not just in Texas, but everywhere. Examples:

Mimi Coffey DWI Lawyer, Shocking DWI TruthsIn the State of New Jersey, you can’t have a jury trial for a DWI. Yes, the United States Constitution entitles you to a jury trial when accused of a crime, but the New Jersey judges ignore it. The National College for DUI Defense (NCDD) member John Menzel took this case up to the highest Supreme Court in New Jersey recently, yet they still decided against following a basic tenet of the United States Constitution.

In the State of Ohio, their Supreme Court has said in Ohio v. Vega that you can’t cross examine a breath test machine. “What?!” You ask? What about the right to cross examine witnesses? Yes, the United States Constitution guarantees every citizen accused of a crime the right to cross examine their accuser. Does this include a machine that says you are guilty (the operators, the scientific lab director, etc.)? Of course, but not according to the Supreme Court of Ohio. NCDD members Shawn Dominy and Tim Huey has been attacking this nonsense for years and in 2014 a brave Ohio judge ruled the Intoxilyzer 8000 breathalyzer was unreliable (because it is) in Ohio v. Lancaster. Yet, Ohio v. Vega remains the law in Ohio.

Mimi Coffey DWI LawyerIn Texas, there is no such thing as double jeopardy when it comes to DWI. Once the court sentences you, guess what? Without any hearing, a whole different branch of the government sends you a bill for $3,000 to $6,000 because you got convicted. This is higher than the largest fine a court can punish you with in a misdemeanor class B DWI. What happens if you don’t pay it? You get arrested for driving with an invalid license and tagged with late fees and interest on top of the surcharge.

How can that happen, you ask? What do the judges have to say about it? How can a government agency act independently and with no abandon from the state’s entire criminal justice system? I can’t tell you. I sued the Texas Department of Public Safety over this illegal (no due process and excessive punishment, both illegal under the Constitution) surcharge program in federal court and a federal magistrate dismissed my case (this litigation I undertook cost me thousands of dollars).

There are so many more examples of ignoring the law and people’s rights in many states when it comes to DWI.

So, what is going on? Across the country, citizens accused of DWI look to hire Top DWI Lawyers expecting that whether they are guilty or not guilty the courts will guarantee their Constitutional and legal rights throughout the process. Guess again. Why is this happening? I have practiced law 24 years. The answer is “the ends justify the means.” Judges ignore the Constitution and laws because they think the public does not care. The truth is the public does care, for many reasons. One of which, is they or someone close to them have been charged with a DWI (average of 1.4 million DWI arrests in the U.S. every year).

I don’t support DWI. No one does. My clients accused of DWI don’t support DWI. But, not supporting DWI does not mean we don’t support the Constitution and our laws. Good people make mistakes. We all do, and when we do make mistakes- an advanced civilization guarantees to its people basic protections. The common thread in this country is that our Constitution and laws are supposed to apply to everyone, no matter what charge they face. It is time for judges to follow the law. This means they must have courage. No American citizen wants a court that ignores our Constitution and laws.

The one thing I have learned in 24 years of practicing law is that courage in the law is rare. I am a 5’2″ half Japanese, 49-year old female. I have never served in the military and never played varsity team sports (not counting tennis). Neither one of my parents graduated with a 4-year college degree (they both dropped out of high school). I don’t have a distinguished lineage, nor did I inherit any wealth. But courage does not take brawn, money or military training. It requires a good heart and an honest conscience. I never sought out to be courageous, I chose to do right at the forks in the road. I chose to:

1. Sue the Pantego Police Department (their officer in my client’s case) when they used police officers to draw blood.

2. Sue the Texas Department of Public Safety over their DWI surcharge program in federal court.

3. Stand up to the civil lawyers of the City of Ft. Worth when they refused to give me the blood discovery on my client’s blood cases. They finally gave up after many hearings where judges shot them down.

4. Fought the City of Arlington when they tried to bill me over $500,000.00 for 6 police officer personnel files. No, it did not stop me. I got all 6 files and they had to deal with the civil lawyer I retained and the threat of media coverage.

Mimi Coffey DWI LawyerThese are a few examples in my career where I had two choices; the easy one (give up, go with the flow) or the right one. In every decision, I was fighting not just for me and my clients but for all my fellow criminal defense lawyers and their clients too. These battles were costly, time consuming, and took their emotional tolls, but to not fight was never a choice. Currently I am battling a national lab who has hired a civil firm, because they too don’t want to hand over the blood discovery which may or may not prove their blood result is accurate.

This past June, I tried to educate judges and prosecutors at the Advanced Criminal Law Seminar of the State Bar of Texas that Chapter 724 of the Texas Transportation Code specifies the qualifications of the who and how of blood draws. Yet, our Texas courts still refuse to follow the law replacing it with ‘a standard of reasonableness’ because it is more convenient for law enforcement to let them do what they want.

A judge too must fight (the media, their colleagues) and be courageous to make the right decision. It is too easy to make the wrong and illegal choice, especially when it comes to legal issues surrounding politically charged topics like DWI. But like forcing a child to take their medicine, it is necessary. The right decisions are so often the toughest ones to make. Following the Constitution and laws is the only protection we have in this country. Have courage. Follow the law. I envision a time where the administration of DWI justice does not involve shocking truths.

More about Mimi Coffey

When people look for a Top DWI Attorney or Best DWI Attorney, they look for experience, certification, and respect in the legal community. Mimi Coffey is a nationally-renowned trial attorney, board-certified in DWI by the NCDD. She has been practicing for over 24 years and is an author of multiple DWI Defense textbooks. She is also a national and state-wide lecturer on the law.

The Coffey Firm handles a wide variety of cases, including Unlawful Carrying Weapon (UCW), Assault (including family violence), Theft and Possession charges.

Mimi is also listed on several “top” directory listings such as DWI Lawyers for Wise County, DWI Lawyer Tarrant County, DWI Lawyer Dallas County, DWI Lawyer Collin County and DWI Lawyer Parker County. Mimi is a caring DWI Lawyer in DFW, She is also involved in the Texas Tech School of Law foundation and enjoys using the skills she has developed to give back to the community.

Defending the Asleep at the Wheel DWI cases

Mimi Coffey DWI Lawyer

Mimi Coffey presents on Defending the Asleep at the Wheel DWI cases at the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers & the National College of DUI Defense Las Vegas DUI seminar (2019)

Mimi Coffey:  Mimi is board certified in DWI defense by the National College of DUI Defense (NCDD). She is a Regent with the National College of DUI Defense. She is the chairman of the NCDD Forensics Committee. Mimi is a frequent speaker at both national and state-wide seminars, including the above Defending Asleep-at-the-Wheel cases seminar. She is an experienced DWI attorney with a proven trial record (over 300 cases, with 80% of them being jury trials). Mimi has won the President’s Heart of a Champion Award from the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association (TCDLA) numerous times. She has also spoken at and been the course director for many TCDLA DWI seminars, and she has co-chaired the “Mastering Scientific Evidence” seminar in New Orleans for many years.

More about Mimi Coffey

When people look for a Top DWI Attorney or Best DWI Attorney, they look for experience, certification, and respect in the legal community. Mimi Coffey is a nationally-renowned trial attorney, board-certified in DWI by the NCDD. She has been practicing for over 24 years and is an author of multiple DWI Defense textbooks. She is also a national and state-wide lecturer on the law.

The Coffey Firm handles a wide variety of cases, including Unlawful Carrying Weapon (UCW), Assault (including family violence), Theft and Possession charges.

Mimi is also listed on several “top” directory listings such as DWI Lawyers for Wise County, DWI Lawyer Tarrant CountyDWI attorney Dallas County, DWI attorneys Collin County and DWI attorneys Parker County. Mimi is a caring DWI Lawyer in DFW, She is also involved in the Texas Tech School of Law foundation and enjoys using the skills she has developed to give back to the community.

Mimi Coffey At The Blood, Breath & Tears XXVI in Florida (2019)

Mimi Coffey is board certified in DWI defense by the National College of DUI Defense (NCDD). Mimi is a Regent with the National College of DUI Defense. She is the chairman of the NCDD Forensics Committee. Mimi is a frequent speaker at both national and state-wide seminars. She is an experienced attorney with a proven trial record (over 300 cases, with 80% of them being jury trials).

She even sued the Texas Department of Public Safety in federal court on the Texas DPS surcharge program. When the Pantego Police Department started using officers to draw blood in DWI cases. Mimi even sued the individual officer in civil court. She has won the President’s Heart of a Champion Award from the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association (TCDLA) numerous times. She has spoken at and been the course director for many TCDLA DWI seminars. Mimi has also co-chaired the “Mastering Scientific Evidence” seminar in New Orleans for many years. Mimi Coffey is the author of Texas DWI Defense published by Lawyers and Judges Publishing, now in its second edition.

Mimi Coffey DWI Lawyer

Here, Mimi combines DWI/DUI defense and the ethical concerns involved in representing a client who has someone else paying for the representation in her lecture. This is a complex legal question that many clients, and their families, might deal with during representation.

Mimi Coffey DWI Lawyer
Mimi and course director Michael Kessler

More about Mimi Coffey

When people look for a Top DWI Attorney or Best DWI Attorney, they look for experience, certification, and respect in the legal community. Mimi Coffey is a nationally-renowned trial attorney, board-certified in DWI by the NCDD. She has been practicing for over 24 years and is an author of multiple DWI Defense textbooks. She is also a national and state-wide lecturer on the law.

The Coffey Firm handles a wide variety of cases, including Unlawful Carrying Weapon (UCW), Assault (including family violence), Theft and Possession charges.

Mimi is also listed on several “top” directory listings such as DWI Lawyers for Wise County, DWI Lawyer Tarrant CountyDWI Lawyer Dallas County, DWI Lawyer Collin County and DWI Lawyer Parker County. Mimi is a caring DWI Lawyer in DFW, She is also involved in the Texas Tech School of Law foundation and enjoys using the skills she has developed to give back to the community.

Mimi Coffey DWI/Criminal Defense Lawyer Credentials

"<yoastmark

Mimi Coffey is a nationally-renowned trial attorney, board-certified in DWI by the NCDD. She has been practicing for over 24 years and is an author of multiple DWI Defense textbooks and is a national and state-wide lecturer on the law. She is also a Regent with the NCDD. Furthermore, She is the chairman of the NCDD Forensics Committee. She is the founder of The Coffey Firm. With offices in both Dallas and Tarrant Counties, The Coffey Firm serves the entire metroplex.

Mimi has appeared as a legal commentator for CNNNational Fox News, and local Dallas/Fort Worth stations on DWI-related stories. She is also a frequent speaker at both national and state-wide seminars on DWI Defense and other topics. Mimi is an experienced attorney with a proven trial record (over 300 cases, with 80% of them being jury trials). Her successes include everything from .21 breath tests, blood tests to 3 car accident cases.

Mimi’s DWI Defense case law

Mimi’s cases have also made excellent case law for the State of Texas. She even sued the Texas Department of Public Safety in federal court on the Texas DPS surcharge program. She has won the President’s Heart of a Champion Award from the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association (TCDLA) numerous times. Mimi also led the effort to get the Texas Board of Legal Specialization to recognize the NCDD’s DWI Certification. Mimi has been active over 4 legislative sessions in fighting against bad DWI laws. Her efforts prevented the breath/blood test refusal as being a separate crime. She has also argued for true deferred adjudication for DWI.

State Representative Charlie Geren passed Mimi’s bill that entitles citizens accused to a copy of their DWI video tape, previously forbidden by law. Mimi has four (national) and six (Texas) published DWI related articles. She is the author of Texas DWI Defense published by Lawyers and Judges Publishing, now in its second edition.

More about Mimi Coffey

When people look for a Top DWI Attorney or Best DWI Attorney, they look for experience, certification, and respect in the legal community. Mimi Coffey is a nationally-renowned trial attorney, board-certified in DWI by the NCDD. She has been practicing for over 24 years and is an author of multiple DWI Defense textbooks. She is also a national and state-wide lecturer on the law.

The Coffey Firm handles a wide variety of cases, including Unlawful Carrying Weapon (UCW), Assault (including family violence), Theft and Possession charges.

Mimi is also listed on several “top” directory listings such as DWI Lawyers for Wise County, DWI Lawyer Tarrant CountyDWI Lawyer Dallas County, DWI Lawyer Collin County and DWI Lawyer Parker County. Mimi is a caring DWI Lawyer in DFW, She is also involved in the Texas Tech School of Law foundation and enjoys using the skills she has developed to give back to the community.

Mimi Coffey is Board Certified in DWI Defense by the NCDD.

Mimi Coffey is a nationally-renowned trial attorney, board-certified in DWI by the NCDD, who has been practicing for over 24 years and is an author of multiple DWI Defense textbooks and is a national and state-wide lecturer on the law. Mimi has been a speaker on DWI in many states across the country including Arizona, Louisiana, Missouri, Idaho, Nevada and Florida. Furthermore, Her passion for educating other lawyers dates back to 1999. Finally, She literally wrote Texas’ DWI Defense textbook, and the 2nd edition came out in 2018.

Mimi Coffey DWI Lawyer, Mimi Coffey Teaching

Texas DWI Authority (frequent lecturer on DWI)

More about Mimi Coffey

When people look for a Top DWI Attorney or Best DWI Attorney, they look for experience, certification, and respect in the legal community. Mimi Coffey is a nationally-renowned trial attorney, board-certified in DWI by the NCDD. She has been practicing for over 24 years and is an author of multiple DWI Defense textbooks. She is also a national and state-wide lecturer on the law.

The Coffey Firm handles a wide variety of cases, including Unlawful Carrying Weapon (UCW), Assault (including family violence), Theft and Possession charges.

Mimi is also listed on several “top” directory listings such as DWI Lawyers for Wise County, DWI Lawyer Tarrant CountyDWI Lawyer Dallas County, DWI Lawyer Collin County and DWI Lawyer Parker County. Mimi is a caring DWI Lawyer in DFW, She is also involved in the Texas Tech School of Law foundation and enjoys using the skills she has developed to give back to the community.

NCDD Regent, Mimi Coffey

NCDD logo

Mimi Coffey is a Regent of the NCDD (National College for DUI Defense). She wrote the DWI textbook: Texas DWI Defense and has 4 national & 6 statewide articles published on DWI/DWI related issues. Also, Mimi Coffey is a nationally-renowned trial attorney, board-certified in DWI by the NCDD, who has been practicing for over 24 years and is an author of multiple DWI Defense textbooks and is a national and state-wide lecturer on the law. In addition, She is also the chair of the forensic committee for the NCDD. The committee tracks the progress and advocates for changes in forensic science to ensure clarification of forensic terms. Importantly, this clarification helps not only DWI Defense Attorneys, but also Prosecutors, other Criminal Defense attorneys and the general public.

In this video, Mimi introduces herself and the work that the Forensic Committee of the NCDD performs. She also comments on the current discussions going on by the National Commission on Forensic Science. One such discussion involves the push to define the measurement of uncertainty and how to report uncertainty. Mimi and the rest of the committee take pride in keeping its members and the general public updated on the current development in forensic science.

More about Mimi Coffey

When people look for a Top DWI Attorney or Best DWI Attorney, they look for experience, certification, and respect in the legal community. Mimi Coffey is a nationally-renowned trial attorney, board-certified in DWI by the NCDD. She has been practicing for over 24 years and is an author of multiple DWI Defense textbooks. She is also a national and state-wide lecturer on the law.

The Coffey Firm handles a wide variety of cases, including Unlawful Carrying Weapon (UCW), Assault (including family violence), Theft and Possession charges.

Mimi is also listed on several “top” directory listings such as DWI Lawyers for Wise County, DWI Lawyer Tarrant CountyDWI Lawyer Dallas County, DWI Lawyer Collin County and DWI Lawyer Parker County. Mimi is a caring DWI Lawyer in DFW, She is also involved in the Texas Tech School of Law foundation and enjoys using the skills she has developed to give back to the community.

Involuntary Intoxication: Texans Be Aware That The Law is Not Helpful

involuntary intoxication

A DWI by drugging – one’s worst nightmare….

“I no longer knew what was real and what wasn’t. The lines between reality and delusion had become so blurred.” ― A.B. Shepherd, The Beacon

This is what has happened to judges in courts across Texas when it comes to DWI charges.  The government created the penal code to punish crime and thereby deter others from committing the same crime.  Most crimes involve people making bad moral choices, choices that hurt others.  Most crimes involve intent to commit the crime. The law recognizes we cannot punish people for actions they did not or could not have intended.  That is why we have defenses that include mistake of fact, mistake of law, duress, entrapment, self defense, and necessity to name a few.  Yet, Texas courts have rejected the defenses for involuntary intoxication

How Texas treats involuntary intoxication

Texas addresses intoxication, the culpability state, in penal code §8.04 (a). Voluntary intoxication does not constitute a defense to the commission of crime.  From this Texas courts have determined that DWI requires no intent to commit the crime. But, they have expounded on this principal to the non-logical extreme to preclude any defense to DWI.   This is wrong, it ignores principals of actus reus and automatism.  Getting “voluntarily intoxicated” can’t be a defense to DWI. The act of driving while intoxicated assumes intoxication.  But what if your intoxication was NOT voluntary? what then? This is where the judicial delusions begin.

In Brown v. State, 2009 WL 3853859 (Tex. App.- Fort Worth, 2009, reh. Denied), the Court said an involuntary intoxication defense would NEVER be available in a DWI case as there is no intent to commit a DWI requisite to a conviction. Thus, since there is no mental culpability rule, all DWI scenarios are fair game for conviction. In Brown, the defendant had two drinks before bed, woke up and took Ambien instead of his blood pressure pills. The judge denied the jury from determining the issue of “involuntary intoxication.”

The highest appellate criminal court in Texas recently agreed with the Brown court outcome on similar facts in Farmer v. State, 411 S.W.3d 901 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) where Farmer ingested an Ambien his wife set out in place of his normal pills. Here, the Court states that the argument of ‘voluntary act’ (lack of actus reus) was improper and that it should have been a defense of “involuntary intoxication” argued (which the Texas courts in countless decisions has stated does not exist) and gave no grounds of relief. Yes, legal running in circles to get the end result: a DWI conviction.

“Slipped a mickie” cases

Just as troubling are the “slipped a mickie” in the drink cases.  In Bearden v. State, 2000 WL 19638 (Tex. App. –Houston [1st Dist.] 2000), the defendant testified that someone had slipped something in his drink. The court did not allow the jury to judge the credibility of the defense and its merits. The Court reasoned the legislature had not included a culpable mental state in the definition of DWI.

In McKinnon v. State, 709 S.W.2d 805 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth, 1986) with similar facts, the Court blamed the defendant. The judge disallowed the defense because she did not prove the who, what, and how of the drugging. This begs the dangerous reality that when people do have their drinks drugged, which is an unfortunate situation not all too uncommon, the perpetrators do not generally make neon light confessions to the act before, while or after they do it.

What is even more troubling, is that GHB leaves the body in less than 12 hours making it near impossible to prove drugging as the defendant is rarely bonded out in this time. Texas courts have also attempted to rule out in the “automatism” defense using the same flawed logic. In Nelson v. State, 149 S.W.3d 206 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth 2004), the court ruled that automatism, “engaging in what would otherwise be criminal conduct if done in a state of unconsciousness or semi-consciousness” falls within the insanity defense where it does not apply to DWI due to no mental state or intent being a part of the proscribed conductThus in a convenient one fell swoop, the court rejects automatism without ever addressing its merits which has nothing to do with the insanity defense.   

Other States

Although the insanity of MADD pressure on elected politicians has contributed to this type of agenda based decision making, other states have set great examples in the area of “involuntary intoxication.” California in People v. Holloway, 164 Cal. App. 4th (2008),  declared “No sufficient reason can be given for punishing those who have become drunk through unavoidable accident, or through an honest mistake.” In this  case the defendant was  “sleep driving” due to a medication he took while unconscious due to its effects.

The Georgia Court of Appeals held in Colon v. State, 256 Ga. App. 505 (2002),  a GHB poisoning case,  the ultimate merit of an involuntary intoxication defense goes  to the jury once the defendant has proven by a preponderance of the evidence the “involuntary intoxication must render the person incapable of distinguishing from right or wrong and must be attributable to consumption of a substance through excusable ignorance or the coercion, fraud, artifice, or contrivance of another.”

Thomas Jefferson said, “Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.”  It does not take a law degree to know that prosecuting, much less convicting, someone of DWI who is a victim of drugging or taking the wrong medication violates all moral boundaries. Sure, where there is a question of whether the involuntary intoxication defense is legitimate is a question to decide on a case by case basis that should be left to the jury or trial judge for its merits.

Appellate Courts are Wrong to Twist Logic

For appellate courts to twist logic and legal semantics to prevent such defenses from its citizenry is wrong. DWI enforcement all the way up to the highest court in Texas has turned into a witch hunt when victims have no redress.  It is time we get back to basic justice in the world of DWI.  Mark Twain said, “Always do what is right. It will gratify half of mankind and astound the other”.  Texas judges, bring back the involuntary intoxication defense, to do otherwise is no different than supporting corruption.  The primary goal of DWI punishment is preventing victims. Yet, when those victims have become intoxicated through no reasonable fault of their own, Texas courts have turned their back. This is hypocrisy in the name of blind allegiance to zero tolerance not justice.

More about Mimi Coffey

When people look for a Top DWI Attorney or Best DWI Attorney, they look for experience, certification, and respect in the legal community. Mimi Coffey is a nationally-renowned trial attorney, board-certified in DWI by the NCDD. She has been practicing for over 24 years and is an author of multiple DWI Defense textbooks. She is also a national and state-wide lecturer on the law.

The Coffey Firm handles a wide variety of cases, including Unlawful Carrying Weapon (UCW), Assault (including family violence), Theft and Possession charges.

Mimi is also listed on several “top” directory listings such as DWI Lawyers for Wise County, DWI Lawyer Tarrant CountyDWI Lawyer Dallas County, DWI Lawyer Collin County and DWI Lawyer Parker County. Mimi is a caring DWI Lawyer in DFW, She is also involved in the Texas Tech School of Law foundation and enjoys using the skills she has developed to give back to the community.